Help support this site
- Buy Prints
- Hire me for photographic services
- Become a patron of the arts
- Buy me items from my Amazon or BH Photo
wish lists. Items start at just a few dollars.
- How much is this site worth to you? Amazon Honor System
Payment or
- I'd be glad to take almost any old photo gear you don't want off your hands.
- Link to my sites:
<a href="http://grandviewphoto.com/"><img src="http://grandviewphoto.com/grand_view_logo.png"
alt="Grand View Photography" border=0 width=167 height=60></a>
grandviewphoto.net: free photographic services for
non-profits in King and Pierce counties of Washington state.
<a href="http://irgth.com/"><img src="http://irgth.com/not_quite_right_logo.png"
alt="Not Quite Right Photography" border=0 width=376 height=39></a>
<a href="http://gpb.seanet.com/ts/"><img src="http://gpb.seanet.com/graphics/gpb_ts_logo.png"
alt="GPB Technology Services" width=356 height=81 border=0></a>
irgth.net: focused on my portfolio
- Write a testimonial that I can use in my promotional materials, including my sites. You can email me at photo [at]
gpb.seanet.com or use the contact form on one of my sites.
|
Party Photos
|
updated: November 3, 2007
|
|
NEW: Nerdvana Hallowthanksmaseen photos.
Note: these document debauchery that you may find offensive and/or titillating.
If you happen to be in any of these photos and want them pulled from this site, just let me know.
|
|
Motorsports
|
updated: July 1, 2007
|
|
Sovren Vintage Race photos.
|
| Photojournalism: shooting at local Exxon |
July 6, 2005 |
|---|
|
While returning from getting groceries, I noticed a large number of police officers at the the local Exxon gas station/convenience store. Of course, I had to take pictures. Nothing special, but good practice for the next time I see anything newsworthy.
|
| grandviewphoto.com |
June 11, 2005 |
|---|
Need a photographer?
I've launced a new site dedicated completely to photographic services. Grand View Photography also has a non-commercial site
where I am offering free photographic services to non-profits.
|
| irgth.com |
April 9, 2005 |
|---|
Want a print of one of my images?
I've just launched irgth.com as an ecommerce site where you can
buy prints. Package pricing for photography services can also be found there.
|
| New article |
May 5, 2005 |
|---|
|
Recipe for a good photo
|
|
Messages Movie set
|
updated: April 9, 2005
|
|
movie set photos
|
| My ten best 10d pictures |
updated: June 13, 2004 |
|---|
|
I consider the first six of these to be 4 star images, and the last four to be 3
star.
My photographic goal for 2004 is to fill my entire list of top ten photos with 4
star images, and at least one 5 star image. |
| More photos |
updated: March 23, 2004 |
|---|
|
my public portfolio
This does not include any of my event (parties, graduations, movie set),
commercial or nude photography.
|
| This page best viewed with Safari |
Updated April 25, 2005 |
|---|
|
I use the Adobe RGB color mode when taking photographs. Unfortunately, most browsers do not yet
support Adobe RGB color. If you are not using Safari, you will be shown versions converted to
standard RGB. Some older images are only available in standard RGB.
|
|
About how I rate my photos.
|
updated: March 3, 2004
|
There is
approximately one order of magnitude increase in the standard to
qualify for each star. Fractions of a star are rounded down. This is highly subjective, and I
probably spend way too much time thinking about what rating to give any particular image.
- * (one star)
- Crap.
A one star image is neither technically good nor aesthetically
pleasing. A typical example of a one star image would be most
snapshots or vacation photos taken with a disposable camera, or
a drivers license photo.
- ** (two stars)
- Mediocre.
A two star image might have something of interest in it, but
be nearly ruined by major flaws. A two star image may be
technically good, but just boring. A typical example of a two
star image would be any portrait you get taken in a mall or
Sears portrait studio.
- *** (three stars)
- Decent.
A three star image has some emotional, intellectual or aesthetic impact, at least if you know
the story behind the photo. A typical example of a three star image is an average newspaper
photo. It is likely to resonate for a sizable percentage of viewers.
- **** (four stars)
- Good.
A four star image is worth framing. It usually has something to say, and doesn't need any
explanation to have an impact. It is good enough to be the focal point for an article in a
major magazine. A typical example of a four star image would be the fashion photography in
most catalogs from large retailers.
- ***** (five stars)
- Excellent.
A five star image is perfect, or nearly so. Any flaws somehow manage to work to its
advantage. Good enough to be considered an important work of art. A typical example of a five
star image would be many of the popular photos by Ansel Adams.
I have not yet taken any photos that I would give 5 stars to. There are very few of my photos that I think are "Good".
I have learned enough that for any given shooting session, I will almost always get at least a
few "Decent" images. Overall all, I think I am a decent photographer, which puts me on the
same level as most other professional photographers. There are many "Good" photographers
out there, but most of them will charge many times what I do.
A note on post-processing. Using Photoshop and other tools, I can often
make enough improvements to get one more star than what the image looked
like straight out of the camera. Of the four star images I have so far,
half started out as a 3 star that just needed some tweaking.
|
|
Copyright, prints and allowed use
|
Updated: April 25, 2005
|
|
All of the images here are copyrighted. Permission is granted to
download copies and/or print these images for your personal noncommercial use.
You may NOT include these images on your website without my express permission. You MAY
include these images in a 'blog posting, provided that you clearly attribute the source of
the image, and include a link to either this page, or the page the image was featured on. $3 donation suggested for personal sites, $10 for
profitable sites.
Information about purchasing prints of these images.
If you wish to use any of these images for commercial purposes, please contact me. All of these images have been resized for use
on the web, if you purchase a license for commercial use of an image, you will be provided with the
best quality digital file
possible.
|
|
Camera Stores Compared
|
Updated: June 13, 2004
|
I've bought camera gear from a number of stores. Since I'm feeling a bit aggravated at
the moment with the low quality of service that I have received, I thought I'd post
brief reviews of the places I've bought photo gear from.
- Kits Camera, Tacoma Mall
- Mediocre service from camera salespeople (one of them did let me know when to
expect their first Canon 10D to arrive, which was nice). However, they screwed up
both print orders I placed. They were unable to print the first order, and made
many many many errors with the second.
- Adorama.com
- Screwed up 2 out of 5 orders. One order didn't ship until 3 or 4 days after I
placed it. The customer service was lousy when I called in to
straighten out the messed up orders. You can tell that the guys
who answer the phone do not enjoy their jobs.
- Robis Camera
- They are expensive, but have good service. The salespeople can be slightly
pushy. No screwups yet. I've only made relatively small purchases from them.
- BHPhoto.com
- Screwed up 1 out of 5 orders. I called in an order once, and the salesperson
was great. For the screwed up order, customer service was mediocre when I called
in.
- Amazon.com
- Flawless, but you have to pay sales tax.
|
|
Old photos
|
updated: March 23, 2004
|
|
If after looking through here, you want to see some of my older
stuff from a low quality camera, try my dc4800 gallery.
Most of my dc4800 photos are ** out of 5, but there are a few
*** out of 5 scattered about. There are also quite a few * out
of 5 in there, especially in the older sections. The ratings are not shown though.
|
| Equipment |
updated: June 13, 2004 |
|
I currently use a Canon 10D, and a variety of lenses. For the most part, I use prime lenses instead
of zooms. Currently, about half of my lenses are from Canon, and the other half are Sigmas.
|
|
|
|
|
